Showing posts with label archaeological finds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label archaeological finds. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 May 2014

Arc-Team: Professionals at Work - the "Frozen Stories" videoclip


Since several years, the Department of Archaeology of the Autonomous Province of South-Tyrol has been documenting and rescuing various archaeological remains in high alpine environment. The project area for late summer 2013 was the Langgrubenjoch a passage between the Schnalser- and the Matscher-Valley.


The site is located on an altitude of about 3100m.a.s.l. (10170ft) and offers a striking variety of wooden finds from prehistory to antiquity.


The project was directed by Dr. Hubert Steiner, member of the Department of Archaeology of the Autonomous Province of South-Tyrol, who is also one of the curators of the exibition "FROZEN STORIES - Discoveries in the Alpine glaciers" at the South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology (Bozen) from 25 February 2014 to 22 February 2015.


+Luca Bezzi announced it on ATOR first in february 2014 in the post "High mountain archaeology: Frozen Stories".


The South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology is home of the "Iceman Ötzi"  one of the biggest archaeological sensations in the 20th century. The site of Langgrubenjoch is situated just a few kilometers from his finding place.

Frozen Stories provides for the first time some of the findings from Langgrubenjoch toegether with a video clip, filmed during the survey by ourselves, which shows the whole archaeological working process in such extreme circumstances.


The publication on ATOR was possible by courtesy of the directorship of the South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology, represented by Andreas Putzer. Thanks also to Hubert Schönegger and the Team of Geosfilm, for converting the video and splitting the soundtrack.



Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Financial Candlestick chart for archaeological purposes: preliminary tests

Candlesticks chart is a plot used primarily in finance for describing price movements of quoted stock, derivative or currency over time. It is a combination of a line-chart and a bar-chart:

Chart made by R package "Quantmod"

the wick (i.e. one or two lines coming out from the polygon) illustrates the highest and lowest traded prices during the time interval represented; the body (i.e. the polygon) illustrates the opening and closing trades. Candlesticks chart seems apparently similar to box plots, but they are totally different (source: Wikipedia, 05/02/2013).
I often saw this kind of chart in newspapers or in TV, but only now I have undertaken to understand how it works; and so I had the “crazy” idea of applying candlesticks chart to archaeological data.
More specifically I thought about archaeological finds. For many of them - in particular for ceramic types - we know a starting date, i.e. the period in which a specific production begins, a time range of maximum diffusion, defined by an initial moment and a final one, and an end date after which there are no more traces of our object.
If we replace the 4 financial values of higest, lowest, opening and closing price with these 4 chronological value (starting date, initial and final moments of maximum diffusion's range, end date), we could use profitably candle plot for describing the life's path of each archaeological material found in a stratigraphic unit (US); the goal is to date the same US by comparing the candlesticks of all materials contained therein.

In R Candlesticks chart is provided by Quantmod package, Quantitative Financial Modelling & Trading Framework for R (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quantmod/index.html). But this package is very specific for financial purposes and requires specific data types like time series (xts): so I put aside the idea of using the Quantmod package and I tried to build a new R function for plotting candlesticks with non-financial data.
This is a first (simplified) example of my preliminary tests (for which I have to thank R-help mailing list: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help).

I built a table like this:

find, min, int_1, int_2, max
find_a, 250, 300, 400, 550
find_b, 200, 350, 400, 450
find_c, 350, 400, 450, 500
find_d, 250, 350, 450, 500
find_e, 200, 400, 500, 600

For each archaeological object (find_a, find_b, find_c, …) is given the starting date (min), the initial and final moments of maximum presence range (int_1, int_2) and the end date (max), all in approximate years.
I plotted this dataframe in R using “with()” function that enables to build a personal environment from data. Here is the source code:

> US1 <- read.table("../example.txt", header=TRUE, sep=",")
> with(US1, symbols(find, (int_1 + int_2)/2, boxplots=cbind(.4,int_2-int_1,int_1-min,max-int_2,0), inches=F, ylim=range(US1[,-1]), xaxt="n", ylab="Years (AD)", xlab="Findings", main="Findings chronological distribution of US 1", fg="brown", bg="orange", col="brown"))
axis(1,seq_along(US1$find),labels=US1$find)

and here is the result:


Analyzing this plot it is possible to deduce that the layer US1 probably dates back to the first half of 5th century A.D.; the materials find_a and find_b could be residuals of previous ages.


As I said, this is just a simple example, but potentialities are clear. This method enables to plot the duration of archaeological materials and to compare the datings of objects found in stratigraphic units for assigning them a chronological information. The statistical environment could provide other advantages like probabilistic analyses, confidence intervals, etc., giving a mathematical-statistical support to the usual (and often subjective) dating of the archaeological layers.
The next steps will be the building of a specific R function for “archaeological” candle plot, starting from the simple code written above, and tests to plot the duration of archeological finds with other statistical techniques like seriation, boxplot, etc.

Any suggestions, websites, literature and bibliographic references about this topic, advice on R packages different from Quantmod that provide candlesticks chart without financial data are welcomed.

by Denis Francisci

Wednesday, 29 August 2012

3D documentation of small archaeological finds

Today I want to present the results of an experiment we did 2011 thanks to the collaboration of Nicolò Dell'unto (Lund University).
The goal of the project was the comparison between different methodologies in documenting small archaeological finds. In such a wide applications field we decided to evaluate mainly two technologies: Computer Vision (Structure form Motion and Image-based modeling) and optical sensors.
In both groups we compared open source and closed source possibilities, documenting the same artefact with Microsoft Photosynth (closed source software), Python Photogrammetry Toolbox (open source software), then with a NextEngine Scanner (closed source hardware) and finally with Three Phase Scan (open source hardware).
For the test we used a souvenir from Lund: the small statuette of a female viking (we called her Viky) you can see in the image below.

The test object: Viky

  
The characteristics of such an object granted us a medium-high gradient of difficulty (a good level to test our technologies).
For all the post-processing elaboration we used MeshLab (also when another commercial software was avalaible, like for the NextEngine Scanner), because we considered it a "killer application" for mesh-editing (by the way, for next experiments I would also consider CloudCompare, another great open source project). The screensot below shows the four results of our experiment.

 
Comparison of the four 3D documentations

To better observe the differencies between the four 3D models it is possible to check the next panoramic 2D (sorry I did not clean all the models, but I think it is enought to understand the general quality):




Python Photogrammetry Toolbox





MS Photosynth








Three Phase Scan
NextEnigine Scanner










As you can see there is not a big difference between the two Computer Vision documentations, as they are based on similar software (having a common origin in the Photo Tourism project), while the comparison between the NextEngine and Three Phase Scan is simpler: untill now the open source instrument is not accurate enought to record small objects (it is possible to observe the error on the arms of Viky), having too low quality for archaeological aims. Anyway, it has to be said that the cathegory of the two optical sensors is different: the NextEngine is a triangulation scanner (very accurate and precise), while the Three Phase Scan is a structured-light scan. Unfortunatley we had no time to consider also the open source MakerScanner, which would belong to the same cathegory of the NextEngine.
In conclusion our opinion about 3D small finds recording is that actually the NextEngine is a very good low-cost solution (sadly not open source, IMHO) and it is an optimal choice in those pojects where there is the necessity to document a big amount of objects in a short time. If we consider also the price, then the better applications seems to be the Computer Vision based software Photosynth and Python Photogrammetry Toolbox (PPT). Personally I prefer the second one for two reasons: it is a FLOSS (GPL licensed) and has no need of internet (while with Photosynth it is necessary to upload the pictures on external servers). This characteristic makes PPT a perfect tool in difficult situations, like, for exemple, an arcaheological mission abroad. In these conditions it is possible to record 3D models with a very simple hardware equipment (just a digital camera and a laptop), in short time (at least during data acquisition) and without an internet connection (as I described in this post). Moreover PPT (and in general CV vision applications) gave us also good results in "extreme" projects, like we illustrated in the slides (sorry, just italian) of our contribution during the Low-Cost 3D workshop, held in Trento in March 2012


2016-04-07 Update

In 2011 we wrote an article about this experienced:

ResearchGate: Article
Academia: Article

I hope it will be useful, even if no more up to date it.

Sunday, 14 August 2011

3D for archaeological finds

One of the most common question we receive about SfM and Computer Vision techniques is: "is it possible to document in 3D also small objects like archaeological finds?". The answer is yes, it is, and there are two possible ways:
  1. putting the object to record on a turntable (with a black panel as background) and taking pictures from a fix point  (as I described in this post)
  2. taking pictures walking around the object (the easiest way)
Untill now, in both cases, it is better to use Bundler 3 instead Bundler 4 (that seems to have some problems with symmetrical objects). Anyway for option 2 there is no need to "erase the background" so it is possible to use also the newest version of the sofware (which is the one inside Python Photogrammetry Toolbox). This is because other objects in the background can help Bundler to find the right position of the cameras for every picture. the image below is an example of this situation: I took the photos walking around the archaeological find, which was simply placed on a piece of wood (over a normal A4 paper, for metric references).  

3D documentation of arcaheological finds with Bundler and PMVS2

The archaeological find in the picture comes from the mission in Khovle Gora (Georgia) of University of Innsbruck, Department of Ancient History and Near Eastern Studies, (Walter Kuntner and Sandra Heinsch) and Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University (Prof. Vakhtang Licheli).
BlogItalia - La directory italiana dei blog Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.